How often have we heard, “It’s not what you know but who you know”? In all honesty, the proper proclamation should be “It’s what you know and who you know”. Our expertise and experience are just as valuable as those of “who you know”.
The Parkland CAFA (Canadian Association of Farm Advisors) Chapter gathers monthly for their regular learning
event. It is a meeting of the minds to learn
something we might know very little about.
The presenter on a given topic is the expert. We tap into their
resources and access their authoritative wisdom and knowledge. At any given
meeting, the two professionals or agri-business experts know something the rest
don’t. Their willingness to share is an opportunity for us to learn. When applicable, we even refer clients to the
appropriate professional who can better help them.
I believe everyone understands you
can’t know everything. Having an expert
in your network circle is a valuable “fill-in”
for the information and experience you lack.
A fitting expression, “Mind the
Gap”, heard when you travel the rail system in London, can also be applied
to our knowledge gap. A person can only
know so much, has only so much brain capacity, and has only interest in a
specific area of expertise. There may be
some logic to the statement “a jack-of-all-trades and a master of none!” When we try to be everything, we have to ask
ourselves, “Is this fitting for what I am trying to accomplish for my clients?”
As a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER® professional, I know my limitations and rely
extensively on other professionals. I
appreciate having them in my network; they’re my links to information and
experience.
This past month’s learning event
highlighted two hot topics: Trusts and
the Need for Them, both from a tax and legal perspective; and TOSI
(Tax-on-Split-Income), the new rules and the exceptions-to-the-rules. Our professionals, Jason Heinmiller, a tax
expert, with Collins Barrow and Shawn Patenaude, a lawyer, from his legal firm,
Shawn Patenaude Legal Prof. Corp, are privy to the latest updated information. Procedures and processes are constantly
changing. This is especially true when there’s a change in government. In 2017 the federal government implemented new
rules regarding the way income is distributed to shareholders of private
corporations. The experts, Jason Heinmiller and Shawn Patenaude, addressed the
impact this new legislation has on tax vehicles such as trusts and
corporations.
Our professionals discuss new
legislation with their peers. They dissect and analyze the logistics of the
information to fully understand the new proposals: how they apply, when they apply;
what exceptions exist; and who they affect. They exchange thoughts, ideas, and
ask each other, “If we can’t do this, can we do that?”
The best professionals work
together in tandem with other professionals to decide on the ideal strategies
for their mutual clients. The
collaboration is important especially with multiple generational and blended
families. Family business situations are both complex and complicated. Because
peoples’ intentions are different, a strategy which might work well for one family
operation doesn’t mean it fits another.
When we try to work in isolation and try to do it all, we do our
clients a disservice. When professionals work together as a
smart team, their clients benefit from the best quality advice and service. When
the clients receive a wealth of information from all the angles, they are able
to make the right decisions. I’ve said before, “Good information leads to good
decisions.” Good decisions avoid
financial and costly errors. Some strategies
cannot be undone and are permanent arrangements with dire consequences.
This is an example of a costly
consequence.
A father included his son as a
joint owner on a piece of real estate.
Their relationship became estranged.
When the father requested that his son relinquish his ownership to the
property, the son refused. The courts
decided if the father wanted the son’s name off the title, the father was
obligated to buy his son’s half-share interest at the current fair market value. We don’t know if the father sought legal
advice when he was deciding to make the real estate joint with his son. However, if he had, all the possible outcomes
would have been discussed.
No comments:
Post a Comment